Victory for Fayed; jury to hear Diana inquest
Legal victory: Harrods department store owner Mohamed Al Fayed speaks to the media as he leaves the High Court in central London, yesterday. Britain's High Court ruled that the inquest into the 1997 death of Princess Diana should be heard by a jury. Picture: AFP Harrods department store owner Mohamed Al Fayed speaks to the media as he leaves the High Court in central London, 02 March 2007. Britain's High Court ruled today that the inquest into the 1997 death of Princess Diana should be heard by a jury, overturnin
Saturday, March 3, 2007
THE father of Princess Diana's lover won a significant legal battle yesterday when the High Court decided that the inquest into their deaths in a Paris car crash 10 years ago should be heard by a jury.
Mohamed al Fayed, who is convinced his son and Diana were murdered, had sought to overturn a ruling by Britain's former top woman judge Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to handle the official inquiries on her own.
Three senior judges ordered that the coroner hearing the inquest "shall do so sitting with a jury".
Speaking to reporters outside the court, Fayed said: "We want to be sure that the jury are an independent jury."
He said he hoped Diana's ex-husband Prince Charles and ex-father-in-law the Duke of Edinburgh would be called as witnesses.
Appeal court judge Janet Smith, handing out the High Court ruling, said: "al Fayed has alleged that the Duke of Edinburgh and the Security Services conspired to kill the Princess and Dodi al Fayed.
"The allegation must be inquired into," she said.
Diana, 36, Fayed's son Dodi, 42, and their chauffeur Henri Paul were killed when their Mercedes limousine smashed at high speed into a pillar in a Paris road tunnel as they sped away from the Ritz Hotel, pursued by paparazzi on motorbikes.
A three-year British police investigation ruled at the end of last year that the crash was an accident and not part of an elaborate murder plot as Fayed claims.
The British inquiry backed a French probe which concluded that the driver was to blame because he was drunk, under the influence of anti-depressants and driving too fast.
Hello Magazine's royal correspondent Judy Wade told Reuters: "This just prolongs the agony for William and Harry but Mohamed al Fayed is a grieving father who wants a small triumph like this which would help give him some closure."Reuters
Mohamed al Fayed, who is convinced his son and Diana were murdered, had sought to overturn a ruling by Britain's former top woman judge Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to handle the official inquiries on her own.
Three senior judges ordered that the coroner hearing the inquest "shall do so sitting with a jury".
Speaking to reporters outside the court, Fayed said: "We want to be sure that the jury are an independent jury."
He said he hoped Diana's ex-husband Prince Charles and ex-father-in-law the Duke of Edinburgh would be called as witnesses.
Appeal court judge Janet Smith, handing out the High Court ruling, said: "al Fayed has alleged that the Duke of Edinburgh and the Security Services conspired to kill the Princess and Dodi al Fayed.
"The allegation must be inquired into," she said.
Diana, 36, Fayed's son Dodi, 42, and their chauffeur Henri Paul were killed when their Mercedes limousine smashed at high speed into a pillar in a Paris road tunnel as they sped away from the Ritz Hotel, pursued by paparazzi on motorbikes.
A three-year British police investigation ruled at the end of last year that the crash was an accident and not part of an elaborate murder plot as Fayed claims.
The British inquiry backed a French probe which concluded that the driver was to blame because he was drunk, under the influence of anti-depressants and driving too fast.
Hello Magazine's royal correspondent Judy Wade told Reuters: "This just prolongs the agony for William and Harry but Mohamed al Fayed is a grieving father who wants a small triumph like this which would help give him some closure."Reuters
Business Besides Oil
